Zelensky’s Open Letter to Putin Proposes Direct Talks to End War
Ukrainian president suggests face-to-face meeting and full ceasefire, while Kremlin signals openness and Trump voices support.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has shattered the diplomatic stalemate with an extraordinary open letter to Vladimir Putin, proposing direct face-to-face negotiations to end a war that has ground through its fifth year. Published late on Thursday, the letter — his first public message to the Russian leader since the full-scale invasion in 2022 — calls for a comprehensive ceasefire for the duration of talks and suggests a neutral venue such as Switzerland or Turkey. ‘It is leaders who resolve the key issues,’ Zelensky wrote, warning that Kyiv would continue fighting if Moscow refused to engage [A8][A3].
The Kremlin responded with studied nonchalance, noting through spokesman Dmitry Peskov that Zelensky was ‘welcome in Moscow at any time’ [A1][A6]. President Donald Trump, speaking from the White House, welcomed the prospect of a summit, saying it would be ‘great’ and that both sides would have to compromise [A14][A19]. The US administration, however, remains preoccupied with the spiralling conflict with Iran, a reality Zelensky acknowledged in his letter, arguing that Ukraine could not ‘simply wait’ for Washington to refocus on Europe [A3][A21].
Behind the diplomatic choreography lies a brutal conflict showing no sign of abating. Just hours before the letter’s release, Russian missiles and drones struck multiple Ukrainian regions, killing at least seven people, including at a children’s dairy factory in Brovary [A4]. In recent days, Ukrainian drone attacks have also struck deep inside Russia, including St Petersburg [A26]. The open letter’s defiant tone — reminding Putin that his 26-year rule has been marred by a ‘war without true reason’ — underscores Kyiv’s determination to fight on unless a settlement is reached [A5][A28].
Significantly, Putin separately told journalists that Russia was ready to accept a peace framework discussed with Trump at an August 2025 summit in Anchorage, Alaska, but insisted that Ukraine must cede all of the Donbass region, including areas still under Kyiv’s control [A12]. That demand, repeated by the Kremlin for months, remains a red line for Zelensky, who has proposed an ‘all-for-all’ prisoner exchange and the return of deported children as confidence-building steps [A25]. Analysts in European capitals note that while the exchange of letters marks a rhetorical shift, the fundamental gaps on territory and security guarantees remain vast. Viewed from Moscow, the invitation to visit is a tactic to frame Zelensky as lacking legitimacy; from Kyiv, the open letter is a gambit to show willingness for peace while rallying Western support. The next move likely hinges on whether Washington applies concerted pressure on both capitals — something that, for now, appears secondary to the crisis in the Gulf.
How the same story is told elsewhere.
With the U.S. fully absorbed by the Iran crisis, Zelensky made his pitch directly to Putin, proposing a face-to-face meeting and a full ceasefire. The move is portrayed as Ukraine’s attempt to regain Washington’s attention and prevent the conflict from slipping down the priority list. Trump’s positive reaction is noted, but the focus remains on the strategic distraction.
Zelensky addressed Putin in an unusually direct open letter, stating that the war is a personal choice without real justification, and proposed a face-to-face meeting with a full ceasefire during negotiations. European media emphasise the moral weight of the proposal, while noting the Kremlin’s conditional welcome and Trump’s optimistic remarks. The narrative is one of cautious hope against a backdrop of continued Russian bombardments and territorial demands.
The Iranian narrative presents Zelensky’s open letter as a response to Russia’s military resilience and long-term planning, noting that Russia stands ready to receive him in Moscow while continuing to prepare war plans through 2028. The gesture is framed less as a breakthrough and more as a pragmatic Ukrainian overture that Moscow can entertain from a position of strength. The Kremlin’s willingness is highlighted, along with Putin’s previous statements that Russia will work with legitimate Ukrainian representatives.
This story appeared in
34 sources · 11 languages · 24h window