Somali referee barred from US on eve of World Cup despite valid visa
Omar Abdulkadir Artan became the first Somali selected for a World Cup, but US Customs cited ‘vetting concerns’ and denied him entry, forcing FIFA to remove him from the tournament.

The United States has barred the entry of the Somali referee Omar Abdulkadir Artan, the first from his nation ever selected for a World Cup, days before the tournament begins. On arrival in Miami from Istanbul at the weekend, Artan was held by Customs and Border Protection and subsequently put on a flight back to Turkey. A CBP statement released on Monday, while not naming Artan, confirmed that a Somali national slated to officiate was denied entry after routine inspection, citing “vetting concerns”. The decision has thrown into sharp relief the collision between Washington’s hardened immigration posture and the global character of sport’s most-watched event.
Artan, 34, was celebrated as CAF referee of the year in 2025 and had just overseen the African Champions League final. The Somali youth and sports ministry, through senior adviser Ciise Aden Abshir, confirmed he held a valid visa and had travelled on a diplomatic passport obtained with the help of the Somali embassy in Nairobi. Somalia is among the nations on the Trump administration’s travel-ban list, and despite his documentation, immigration officials deemed his credentials insufficient. “Denying him entry undermines football’s commitment to fairness, merit and fair play,” Abshir told AFP.
FIFA, which had designated Artan as one of 52 referees for the finals, acknowledged that he “will be unable to train and officiate” at the World Cup. The governing body stressed it has no role in host-country immigration decisions. Viewed from Europe, the episode follows a string of visa snarls: an Iraqi forward, Aymen Hussein, was briefly detained, and the Iranian delegation faced similar hurdles. Analysts in London note that the incident tests assurances from organisers that the first World Cup spread across three nations would be as open as it is logistically complex.
With kick-off just days away, the Artan case exposes a widening gap between the inclusive rhetoric of world sport and the sovereign border controls of the host government. Diplomats in Nairobi and Istanbul privately express frustration that a routine designation—intended to showcase talent from beyond football’s traditional powers—has instead become a symbol of exclusion. Whether other officials from affected states will be quietly withdrawn remains an open question that may shadow the tournament’s opening ceremonies.
This story appeared in
40 sources · 9 languages · 24h window